Subj : Re: Cheap Hosting...
To   : Nelgin
From : Tracker1
Date : Wed Mar 24 2021 16:21:20

On 3/22/2021 6:32 PM, Nelgin wrote:
 >>> Telnet and/or SSH still need to be on different ports and NATed in,
 >>> but that's easier to deal with than users or applications that
 >>> expect to be on ports 80 or 443.
 >>
 >> For telnet/ssh you could have a system setup on the standard ports
 >> to telgate to the appropriate internal system... Of course, that
 >> would limit sftp to the one system.
 >
 > Which means you'd be paying for a service to redirect your ports
 > plug the added latency. You might as well get a $50pa VPS.

I was under the assumption the proxy would be local to the other 
systems, and if you're talking telnet etc, the latency isn't really an 
issue.

That said, still prefer vps myself.  Don't have anything potentially 
high target running at home to draw attention to.
-- 
Michael J. Ryan - tracker1@roughneckbbs.com
---
 þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com

.