Subj : Re: Cheap Hosting...
To   : Ogg
From : Tracker1
Date : Mon Mar 22 2021 07:10:53

On 3/20/2021 3:56 PM, Ogg wrote:
>> the main thing i don't care for with IPv6 is the loss of NAT
>> which, granted, is not needed, but it is a way to kind of
>> protect your devices by keeping them hidden... IPv6 is not
>> meant to be hidden and every address is meant to be
>> accessible from everywhere... it is a huge change from IPv4
>> thinking, really...
> 
> Interesting. So there is not such thing as an IPv6 router with a
> NAT?

There's not much point to it... For the most part, you just do a
local broadcast route from a router, you can still setup 
inbound/outbound rules to block inbound traffic, etc.  Most residential 
ISPs aren't great at block allocations, and home routers don't do such a 
great job either.
-- 
Michael J. Ryan - tracker1@roughneckbbs.com
---
 þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com

.