Subj : NetRunner source
To   : ECHICKEN
From : Dumas Walker
Date : Thu Aug 20 2020 13:17:00

>DW> I believe they were pointing out issues with the software, specifically the
>DW> ftn bits that were causing issues. He also did not like that FSXnet was a

>Yes, and to be fair, some were being absolute dicks about it. One guy in partic
>lar was having a massive overreaction to the problem. So things just heated up
>n both sides.

Agreed.  He later had a massive overreation to something I said on another
subject.  I don't see him around much any more.

>DW> ftn bits that were causing issues. He also did not like that FSXnet was a
>DW> network with more than one hub... I got the impression that the ftn issues

> That would be a pretty wacky thing to dislike about an FTN, but okay. :)

I agree.  At least three of the hubs were running mystic but at least one
was not.  That could have been the issue... the mystic bug showed up because
the other hub was not mystic?  I did not really understand it, either.


 * SLMR 2.1a * On the other hand, you have different fingers.

---
 þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP

.