Subj : Re: state of movies
To   : Boraxman
From : Moondog
Date : Sat Oct 30 2021 10:25:00

  Re: Re: state of movies
  By: Boraxman to Brian Rogers on Fri Oct 29 2021 12:35 pm

 > -=> Brian Rogers wrote to HusTler <=-
 > 
 >  BR> @MSGID: <617ABA9E.907.dove-ent@bbs.n1uro.com>
 >  BR> @REPLY: <6179424D.34243.dove-ent@pharcyde.org>
 >  BR> Hello HusTler;
 > 
 >  -=> HusTler wrote to Brian Rogers <=-
 > 
 >  Hu>  How did "Laugh-In" get away with that stuff? Then there's All in the
 >  Hu> Family. These shows would be constantly in the courts.
 > 
 >  BR> Back in the late 60's and 70's we all had much thicker skin and could
 >  BR> appreciate
 >  BR> humor for the wit that was used to create it, not for any sort of
 >  BR> hatred that it was NOT intended for.
 > 
 >  BR> Today people seem to look for things to hate about just so they can
 >  BR> spread hate while trying to justify their behaviors due to the simple
 >  BR> words someone may say.
 > 
 > I think it's only a minority of people who are thin skinned.  The difference
 > that in the 70's people didn't listen to the crazies, now they do.  Companie
 > are bending towards a vocal minority because the mid-wits that staff them ar
 > out of touch and don't realise that 10 flouro-haird nutcases on Twitter don'
 > represent the world at large.
 > 
 > ... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader!

I agree.  The thin skinned folks are a small but vocal minority that not only
speak out alot, but also know which channels of coomunication work the best. 
Prohibition was thought up by a small gorup that was against alcohol, and had
larger sponsors such as Henry Ford.  No politician would say publicly that
they were against prohibition because that would've been spread through the
newspapers and radio, in effect leadign to shame and a primitive form of
cancelling.

---
 þ Synchronet þ The Cave BBS - Since 1992 - cavebbs.homeip.net

.