Subj : Great Replacement Theory
To   : Kaelon
From : Boraxman
Date : Wed Jun 01 2022 20:24:00

-=> Kaelon wrote to Boraxman <=-

 Ka>   Re: Great Replacement Theory
 Ka>   By: Boraxman to Kaelon on Mon May 30 2022 09:45 pm

 > You keep trying to deny there is policy, when clearly, immigration policy,
 > as well as the ideological push towards "diversity" and the "melting pot" is
 > cleary a deliberate goal.

 Ka> I disagree that this is the goal.  You ascribe racialist intent to a
 Ka> demographic policy, because you see the world in racial terms.  I see
 Ka> the world in geopolitical terms, and as I describe elsewhere and here,
 Ka> the policies we have for immigration are numerical in origin: they are
 Ka> economic and they are demographic.  If there were enough White
 Ka> immigrants, for example, willing to accept the economic and demographic
 Ka> circumstances of immigrating to France or Britain, I assure you, they
 Ka> would be taken.

 Ka> "Diversity," as a sociopolitical argument, is a way of managing the
 Ka> outcomes of the goal.  It's really simple: this is all about numbers.
 Ka> The largest (i.e., most populous and geographically expansive /
 Ka> resource rich) nation-states are the most prosperous and powerful on
 Ka> the planet.  Conversely, nation-states with shrinking populations or
 Ka> with ecologically or geographically challenged circumstances, are
 Ka> looking at a certain geopolitical destiny as a second-rate (if not
 Ka> subjugated) power.

 Ka> That's the goal here.
 Ka> _____
 Ka> -=: Kaelon :=-

How do you account for those who clearly state that changing demographics will
change the character of the nation?  How do you account for accusations that
someting is "too white"?  How do you accont for protests against any other view
being "racist".

If one particular view is an "ism", then surely another particular view is as
well.  You view things through a Geopolitical lens, which is reasonable enough,
but at some point we have to step back and say "what for".

I DO take a nationalistic point of view because it is in my self interest to do
so, just as it is in self interest of a ruling elite, or a ruling aristocracy,
to do what it takes to maintain THEIR power.

The largest states may win, but WHAT wins?  There is the issue, the nihilism
inherit within the modern so called nation state.  The state itself is its own
power, its own entity, and represents its own interest, which is decoupled from
the people who had created it.  The US was founded with the idea that would be
for OUR prosperity.  Not for the sake of the state itself, but for the benefit
of the people who founded it.  If not for that, then what?

What value is the UK, or France, or Australia, or the US for that matter, when
the only metric, the only judgement of success is the state appartus and the
administrative entity?  The nation-state become like a corporation, and we
become like employees, who only have an interest if we are employed.

This is the pathology here.  The nation-state has decoupled from the people who
created and built it, and is itself its own meaning.  Britains success is no
longer the success of the British people, but just the organisations that claim
to be "Britain".  The state no longer represents a people.

So why should I care if my own country is the biggest, when it has no loyalty
to me?

It is irrelevant to me if Australia is successful, if the proposition of
Australia no longer represent, or is, what I am.  Just as the US become less
and less relevant, when it represents, less and less, what Americans are.  IT
becomes a hollow proposition state, and such states cannot be free, they must
become authoritarian.  Ultimately, it doesn't matter whether a nation state
lives or not.  They are artificial constructs anyway.  Culture, people, ethnic
groups, that which will still persist, THEY are real.

In the West (unlike say, China), we've removed this factor from our analysis,
from our worldview.  We're purely geo-political, but have defined ourselves out
of existence.  This is why Chinese *WILL* overtake Americans as a force.  There
will still be a Chinese nation, but only a hollowed out American empire.
 
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
 þ Synchronet þ MiND'S EYE BBS - Melb, Australia - mindseye.synchronetbbs.org

.