Subj : Great Replacement Theory
To   : Kaelon
From : Arelor
Date : Mon May 30 2022 18:13:40

  Re: Great Replacement Theory
  By: Kaelon to Arelor on Mon May 30 2022 01:47 pm

 > My position is simple: immigration, as a matter of policy, is unavoidable gi
 > the demographic failure of most Western states.  If a Western state wishes t
 > avoid the subsequent political failure that often follows demographic failur
 > (including, a collapse in tax base, evisceration in the open competitive
 > marketplace, and potentially even military confrontation from larger and mor
 > competitive/populous nations), it must confront its demographic failure.
 > Immigration, as it stands, is seen by most democratic governments as the mos
 > palatable approach to managing this problem.  It is, by no means, the only
 > approach - and, if you live in an authoritarian society, many more options
 > appear on your menu from which governments can select.

Besides, as mentioned earlier, if you import people with a culture different
enough from yours as a solution, your own culture will be extinguished
nevertheless unless you assimilate the incomers. Notice I didn't say
"integrate". I said "assimilate". This is the core reason why your average
nationalist does not buy immigration as a solution.

Some people underestimates greatly how expansive certain cultures are and how
defensive their members are regarding those cultures. This is probably because
Westerns seem to think the usual Western traditions (based on religion, pagan
customes from ages past and whatever have you) are lame and that people from
other cultures have the same appreciation for their own culture as Westerns do
for theirs. This is kind of dangerous because a single person pushing a
cultural agenda is cute but four thousand are a political entity. The Opus Dei
is harmless because there are so few of them: if they were 40% of the
population chances are you'd live under a Christian Theocracy.

I faced the most utter ridicule recently when I watched an Interview at some
representative of a neiughbourhood asociation in Barcelona, regarding Mena gang
activity. Barcelona has one of the most progressive autonomic governments in
Spain right now. This guy said that the neighbourhood was all inclusive,
welcoming and anti-racist, that they loved Moroccans... but that they needed to
get the fuck out because the situation was unsustainable and they needed to be
placed somewhere where they could be helped.

And this is the problem: a typical Nationalist sees this and thinks that, if
one of the autonomic governments who tries the hardest to integrate outsiders
is facing this issue, then mass integration tactics are a failure at best and
a scam at worst.

Actually, I think those types have a point, when it comes to certain types of
culture. Proponents of mass immigration actually claim they can import massive
ammounts of people from countries in which, if you walk around with your 16
years old daughter, you will receive purchase offer for her, and that they can
integrate such worldwiew in the core of the Western world in a conflict-free
way. My grandparents spent a big chunk of their lives in Africa and they were
skepticks towards this idea.

Random thought: why are the pro-feminist parties the ones who are fine
giving incentives to religions and cultures which historically treat women like
garbage?



--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

---
 þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

.