Subj : Great Replacement Theory
To   : Arelor
From : Kaelon
Date : Mon May 30 2022 10:42:34

  Re: Great Replacement Theory
  By: Arelor to Kaelon on Mon May 30 2022 10:50 am

 > The fact you are arguing that "white" countries have to actively import
 > foreigners from non-white backgrounds and then offer training to them for
 > free is equally racist, according to your logic, because you are
 > de-priorizing white natives.

That's hilarious, considering I'm not advocating any such policy.  I am simply articulating that the problem is not a racial or cultural one; it is purely a demographic one, and its principal cause is the low birth rate among native (i.e., non-immigrant) populations in Western countries.  There are many causes behind the declining birth-rate in these countries - chief among them, the higher standards of living, the urbanization of the population, and a heavily industrialized economic system - but nowhere can it be stated that foreigners themselves are the cause of native populations not procreating to sufficient numbers to even just replace themselves (at a rate of at least 2,100 births for every 1,000 women).

It is politically unpalatable in these countries for governments to actually undertake the type of population control that is otherwise possible in non-Western countries (such as China, a country that Boraxman has cited repeatedly).  Natives in Western Countries -- especially women -- are defiant and resistant to the genomic prerogative to procreate and extend legacies, because of the adverse impact that more children cause to native population economic well-being.  This is largely an economic factor, because in an agrarian society, more children necessarily also meant more revenues for the pastoral household.  In an urbanized economy, more children invariably mean more expenses.

There are largely cultural efforts under way in the United States to contend with the declining non-immigrant birth-rate (mostly through the use of religiously-charged reversal of abortion rights), though these efforts will largely backfire because native populations generally have access to birth control measures that will keep their birth rates well below the 2,100 births per 1,000 women minimum to maintain populations.  It is the primarily non-native and native lower-economic segments of society that will suffer under these policies, creating more people in those segments.  Ironically, banning abortion or restricting birth control will drive up the rate at which non-natives will procreate, further diminishing the native population count and further making it inevitable for the non-native population to out-populate the natives.
_____
-=: Kaelon :=-

---
 þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

.