Subj : Great Replacement Theory
To   : Kaelon
From : Boraxman
Date : Sat May 28 2022 18:55:00

-=> Kaelon wrote to Dumas Walker <=-

 Ka> @MSGID: <62910054.59783.dove-deb@vert.synchro.net>
 Ka> @REPLY: <628FE257.25045.dove-deb@capitolcityonline.net>
 Ka>   Re: Great Replacement Theory
 Ka>   By: Dumas Walker to BORAXMAN on
 Ka> Thu May 26 2022 04:19 pm

 > > The common theme is that if the country is White/Western, it MUST become
 > > diverse.
 >
 > And if it is a non-white country that has too much white immigration, it is
 > not called diversity, it is called something derogatory.

 Ka> I would argue that there are very few White/Western countries that
 Ka> aren't facing demographic crisis that, unfortunately, makes them
 Ka> beholden to immigrants for all sorts of reasons (population
 Ka> replacement, chief among them, but so, too, are economic needs).  The
 Ka> United States also has this problem with Central and Southern Americans
 Ka> -- in sharp contrast to the fully-assimilated Latin / Caribbean
 Ka> Americans -- because it relies upon Central and Southern Americans to
 Ka> serve as an economic under-class and labor force population.

 Ka> These demographic crises are caused by a lot of factors, but chief
 Ka> among them are the creation of imperial dependencies upon non-native
 Ka> populations for a variety of reasons.  Conversely, White countries that
 Ka> never engaged in imperial ambitions and thus became dependent
 Ka> (economically or numerically) on non-White populations -- such as
 Ka> Switzerland, Finland, Sweden, and Norway -- aren't called racist for
 Ka> maintaining their white culture.  They are just seen as not having been
 Ka> complicit in the factors that led to the collapse of their own
 Ka> demographic stability and the brutalization of foreign populations.

'
The Nordic countries would indeed be called racist for maintaining their
culture.  There is not a single White/European country which an "anti-racist"
would find acceptable if they eschewed mass immigration in order to maintain
their national character ethnically and culturally.

Ask someone who is "against racism" to say which one, they won't.  Believe me,
I've asked countless of them over many, many years.

Switch it to another peoples, a 'diverse' peoples, shall we say, and the
attitude changes.

By the way, the Arab world was imperialistic, as were the Mongols, and if you
think that the first nations of Australia, America, or the peoples in
Sub-Saharan Africa lived in peace and harmony, you have a skewed view of
history.  They didn't attain the same level of imperialism not because of their
virtues, but lack of technical capacity to do so.
 
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
 þ Synchronet þ MS & RD BBs - bbs.mozysswamp.org

.