Subj : Great Replacement Conspir
To   : Dumas Walker
From : Boraxman
Date : Sun May 22 2022 22:20:00

-=> Dumas Walker wrote to BORAXMAN <=-

 DW> @MSGID: <62892F4B.24975.dove-deb@capitolcityonline.net>
 DW> @REPLY: <62876DD5.23113.dove-deb@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
 > How is something, which is easily observed, now a "conspiracy theory"?  If
the

 > argument is that this result isn't due to a conspiracy, then how is it that
 > agreement on this outcome doesn't qualify?

 DW> I think that Arelor hit the nail on the head.

 DW> What I will say about it is that there are many here in the US who will
 DW> claim it is a conspiracy theory in the sense that some believe the
 DW> government, or others, are doing things to cause it or to help speed it
 DW> along.  They will claim it is a conspiracy theory because they believe
 DW> that government/organizational/inorganic involvement is false.

 DW> Thing is, it is not 100% false.  I cannot say for certain that the
 DW> government is doing so because I do not have any knowledge of that.
 DW> But I do know someone who works for a religious charity who, at least
 DW> before COVID, was indeed involved in actively traveling to Central
 DW> American countries (that are supposedly super dangerous but, if they
 DW> were, I don't honestly think they'd go) to assist/encourage persons
 DW> with aspirations of entering the United States to do so by coaching
 DW> them on what to say and do to get here, and then waiting at the boarder
 DW> for persons they've coached to arrive.

 DW> The charity is doing so, I believe, in order to help encourage more
 DW> people to join their church in the US.  As these are mostly
 DW> Catholic-dominated countries the people are coming from, I am not sure
 DW> how that works since that is not the religion of the charity.  I assume
 DW> they are hoping that these people will convert.

 DW> The person who is working for the charity may be doing so for religious
 DW> reasons, but I can also 100% guarantee that this person would not be
 DW> doing so if they believed there was any chance at all that the people
 DW> who are coming would, if they ever become citizens, be prone to vote
 DW> for Republicans as that would 100% go against their own political
 DW> convictions.

 DW> So, there are oganizations that are indeed actively bringing persons
 DW> into the country in hopes that they will replace other religions, and
 DW> there are at least some persons who are working with them in hopes that
 DW> the persons will replace other political beliefs.

 DW> So, although some of what the people who believe replacement theory is
 DW> an active thing might believe may be 100% untrue, the theory itself is
 DW> not 100% a conspiracy no matter who claims it is.

I don't think it is untrue.  It has been stated publically, multiple times that
we are a melting pot and where this leads, and it is simultaneusly considered
unacceptable to advocate or in anyway act in a way which might prevent this. 
(for example, asking to limit immigration in order not to be replaced).

This is from my understanding the origin of this idea, that there is an overly
zealous immigration policy which would result in effective replacement over the
decades in the Western countries that it is occuring for which it is considered
inappropriate to oppose, and that all Western nations are expected to be on
board with.

I would think that as time goes on, people are going to interpret this as an
existential threat, and see more extreme measures to stop it as justified.

.... DalekDOS v(overflow): (I)Obey (V)ision impaired (E)xterminate
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
 þ Synchronet þ MS & RD BBs - bbs.mozysswamp.org

.