Subj : =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Pedro_S=c
To   : Arelor
From : Boraxman
Date : Mon Apr 11 2022 16:54:22

  Re: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Pedro_S=c
  By: Arelor to Boraxman on Sun Apr 10 2022 08:12 am

 >   Re: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Pedro_S=c
 >   By: Boraxman to Tracker1 on Sun Apr 10 2022 11:06 am
 > 
 >  > Free Markets must mean free movement of people, and therefore I oppose th
 >  > Free movement of Labour is something that will destroy your nation.  I'm 
 >  > sure how on can argue for free movement of Capital, but then deny that sa
 >  > Capital the right t move Labour as it sees fit.  This isn't a free market
 >  > as there is now a disconnect between Capital and Labour.
 > 
 > 
 > Personally, if somebody is not a trouble maker there is not much of a reason
 > for preventing him from moving from a place to another in order to get a job
 > am also a bit confused of free market proponents that are 100% opposed to
 > immigration.
 > 
 > I get limiting the influx of people from troublesome places (ie. people from
 > cultures with wildly opposed morals than yours) but seriously, sending away
 > workforce you don't need and taking workforce you do need is so much better
 > than the alternative.
 > 
 > --
 > gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
 > 
A nation isn't a "workforce".  This idea imposed on us by our "ruling elite",
that our compatriots are exchangeable labour units is dehumanising and
nationally destructive.

Bringing in "labour" en masse is always short-sighted and foolish.  An
immediate gain for a long term cost.  To the business owner, it makes sense,
but to the long term prospects of the nation, not so much.

There is a reason China and Japan don't go down this path, and why these
nations will outlast Western Capitalists nations that do.
/

---
 þ Synchronet þ MS & RD BBs - bbs.mozysswamp.org

.