Board:   [fsxNet] HAM
Subject: Re: Packet BBS?
From:    echicken(21:1/164)
Date:    Fri Oct 04, 2024 15:45

  Re: Re: Packet BBS?
  By: Bob Worm to echicken on Fri Oct 04 2024 21:22:25

 BW> I suppose that works - do you then necessarily post under your callsign or
 BW> does the BBS maintain a mapping from callsign to handle?

I suppose it would depend on the individual BBS package, but in my limited experience there are no handles, just callsigns.

Were I to explore this in Synchronet again, an optional per-user callsign would be stored somewhere to achieve that mapping, or you could have a separate account for ham purposes. Not sure which; there are pros and cons to each.

echicken
electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
 * Origin: electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com (21:1/164)
.