Message-ID: <419A7430.8050300@mdl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:42:08 -0800
From: "Alexey N. Solofnenko" <A.Solofnenko@mdl.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9+ (Windows/20041116)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
References: <20041116213258.GA16695@suffields.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20041116213258.GA16695@suffields.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1083
Lines: 36
How did you get to that conclusion from my email?

Now there are two similar products - one works everywhere and another 
works everywhere but on Windows. After a small fight the first one will 
always win, because people would not want to run two version control 
systems. If eventually SourceForge changes its revision control system 
from CVS - it will choose one system that satisfies most.

- Alexey.


>Yadda yadda yadda, free software is impossible, linux doesn't exist.
>
>It's empirically false. That line stopped being funny back in the
>1990s (when it became blatantly apparent that no matter how many
>vendors you pay off, people will *not* shift from unix platforms).
>
>  
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ Alexey N. Solofnenko
MDL Information Systems, Inc.
work: 510-357-2222x1726
cell: 510-301-1901
/


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/