Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAG5MLG1017280 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:22:21 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7702C53C0E for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:22:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTvw2-0005Z9-1H for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:31:22 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTvvh-0005YV-1l for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:31:01 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTvvg-0005Y5-3z for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:31:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTvvf-0005Y1-QY for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:30:59 -0500 Received: from [206.190.36.78] (helo=smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CTvmp-0005HT-1G for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:21:51 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (dpaun@rogers.com@69.194.157.31 with login) by smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Nov 2004 05:15:10 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (dimi [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAG5FAoX031553; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:15:10 -0500 Received: (from dimi@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAG5F9A3031552; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:15:09 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: dimi set sender to dpaun@rogers.com using -f Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:15:09 -0500 From: "Dimitrie O. Paun" To: Miles Bader Message-ID: <20041116051509.GV6137@rogers.com> References: <20041115191000.GA30577@rogers.com> <41990CD4.9050003@arbash-meinel.com> <20041115225611.GC28559@zipworld.com.au> <20041116043454.GT6137@rogers.com> <41998810.8070309@arbash-meinel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: mlh@zipworld.com.au, "Dimitrie O. Paun" , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 931 Lines: 27 On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:09:10PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > John A Meinel writes: > Hmmm, my emacs branch just hit 700 revisions (in this archive), and I > have no obvious problems in daily usage -- and I access it remotely over > a slow link! However the "tag" command does seem to have some > bogosities with many revisions. What bogosities? :) > Anyway, even if this is a problem, I think bumping the version is pretty > much equivalent to changing your archive in this respect That would be cool. If this is the case (are you sure?), then the year-in-the-arvhice-name technique is needed only for the cases where you have a lot of patches in a given version. Right? -- Dimi. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/