Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAG3A26C026794 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 03:10:02 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ECE53D36 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 03:09:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTtrw-0004nA-U6 for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:19:00 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTtrV-0004kE-BE for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:18:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTtrU-0004jR-0R for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:18:32 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTtrT-0004jO-SW for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:18:31 -0500 Received: from [210.143.35.52] (helo=tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CTtiV-0004HS-BJ; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:09:15 -0500 Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.160] (may be forged)) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id iAG399n24364; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:09:09 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id iAG399M18598; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:09:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from edtmg02.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.16.202]) by mailsv.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id iAG398Y10923; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:09:08 +0900 (JST) Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edtmg02.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAG397Rb004000; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:09:07 +0900 (JST) Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id iAG396wt026652; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:09:06 +0900 (JST) Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 48850441; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:09:06 +0900 (JST) To: "Karl O. Pinc" Subject: Re: Tagline tagging failings -- Was: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla mv gets me an error next commit References: <20041115151313.I8700@mofo.meme.com> <41995266.6060400@arbash-meinel.com> <20041115195312.I16278@mofo.meme.com> <20041115201538.O16278@mofo.meme.com> <20041115205438.U16278@mofo.meme.com> From: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:09:06 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20041115205438.U16278@mofo.meme.com> (Karl O. Pinc's message of "Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:54:38 -0600") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Miles Bader List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1639 Lines: 33 "Karl O. Pinc" writes: >> As I described in my earlier message, it seems perfectly possible to >> do the job efficiently without any such "keeping records", and >> desirable to do so, as such record-keeping has a number of fairly >> severe problems[*]. > > It's not like I know what I'm talking about here, but I've doubts > about your statement. Because if it's _really_ possible to do the > job without "keeping records" then there would be no need for > explicit tagging _ever_, and arch wouldn't have it. No, that's incorrect. Explicit tags are _exactly_ like taglines: they describe an absolute piece of state in the source tree, a file-name-to-id association. "Keeping track" of mv/rm/add would _not_ be "absolute" -- it records a _change_. Recording changes to a dynamic source tree is problematic your records only makes sense in a particular context, and so you must be very careful to make sure it is kept up to date with respect to any further changes -- some of which may happen outside your control. > I'm not impressed with taglines, for reasons given in a previous email. > I'm not asking everybody to give up taglines, I'm asking everybody > who uses taglines to give up on fixing the partial commit problem. Ok; now that I've explained why you're wrong, can you please stop asking this? -Miles -- The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. --Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/