Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAG1p0fs001968 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 01:51:00 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFF27715E for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 01:50:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTsdP-0006tE-Qd for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:59:55 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTsd3-0006sP-32 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:59:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTsd1-0006re-Lx for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:59:31 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTsd1-0006rV-Ie for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:59:31 -0500 Received: from [202.32.8.214] (helo=tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CTsTv-0000Tq-4d; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:50:07 -0500 Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.160] (may be forged)) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id iAG1o2a24705; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:50:02 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id iAG1o2n02509; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:50:02 +0900 (JST) Received: from edsgm02.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.50.208.12]) by mailsv.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id iAG1o1Y11219; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:50:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edsgm02.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAG1nvxu028414; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:49:58 +0900 (JST) Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id iAG1nuwt026447; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:49:56 +0900 (JST) Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 5D4D6441; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:49:56 +0900 (JST) To: "Karl O. Pinc" Subject: Re: Tagline tagging failings -- Was: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla mv gets me an error next commit References: <20041115151313.I8700@mofo.meme.com> <41995266.6060400@arbash-meinel.com> <20041115195312.I16278@mofo.meme.com> From: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:49:56 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20041115195312.I16278@mofo.meme.com> (Karl O. Pinc's message of "Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:53:12 -0600") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Miles Bader List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 654 Lines: 12 "Karl O. Pinc" writes: > I did use 'tla mv' so it ought to have all the details. > Likewise with 'tla add'. Obviously, this won't work with the > tagline id tagging method, but that's not a reason why > explicit taggers should have to put up with these restrictions. It has nothing to do with tagline vs. explicit tagging; neither offers any particular advantage in this matter. -Miles -- 97% of everything is grunge _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/