Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAF8j7Kr006574 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:45:07 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC820533F0 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:45:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTccf-0006is-Dc for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:54:05 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTcbZ-0006eu-Ns for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:52:57 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTcbY-0006eL-Ru for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:52:57 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTcbY-0006e5-NK for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:52:56 -0500 Received: from [217.22.63.39] (helo=relay2.advalvas.be) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CTcSV-0005BK-Bs for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:43:35 -0500 Received: (qmail 7886 invoked by uid 2012); 15 Nov 2004 08:43:22 -0000 Received: from lode.leroy@advalvas.be by relay2.advalvas.be by uid 102 with qmail-scanner-1.22-st-qms (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(194.7.83.67):SA:0(-4.7/5.0):. Processed in 0.538729 secs); 15 Nov 2004 08:43:22 -0000 X-Antivirus-ADVALVAS-Mail-From: lode.leroy@advalvas.be via relay2.advalvas.be X-Antivirus-ADVALVAS: 1.22-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(194.7.83.67):SA:0(-4.7/5.0):. Processed in 0.538729 secs Process 7832) Received: from meel.advalvas.be (HELO nemo.colo.elex.be) ([194.7.83.67]) (envelope-sender ) by relay2.advalvas.be (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Nov 2004 08:43:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 24371 invoked by uid 48); 15 Nov 2004 08:49:39 -0000 Received: from 194.7.240.10 (proxying for unknown) (SquirrelMail authenticated user lode.leroy); by wmail.advalvas.be with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:49:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <22800.194.7.240.10.1100508579.squirrel@194.7.240.10> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:49:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla From: lode.leroy@advalvas.be To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jeremy.shaw@linspireinc.com X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 823 Lines: 24 "The darcs core technology does not seem to have an inherent advantage over arch, but the user experience totally blows tla out of the water. We must make the new user experience for tla superior to darcs and svn, or we will arch will be doomed to obscurity." And it's portable. ( Written in Haskell, darcs is used on on many operating systems including Linux, MacOS X, FreeBSD, and Windows.) -- lode ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Plaats je zoekertjes GRATIS op AdValvas Placez votre petite annonce GRATUITEMENT sur AdValvas http://www.advalvas.be _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/