Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iADCVNwN029895 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:31:23 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3F15460B for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:31:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSxCM-000512-Ui for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:40:10 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CSxBs-0004xY-8Y for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:39:40 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CSxBr-0004wz-GN for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:39:39 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSxBr-0004wT-7M for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:39:39 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CSx22-0002ph-P4 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:29:30 -0500 Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CSx1F-0003eh-Ua; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:28:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:28:41 -0500 To: Robert Collins Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla Message-ID: <20041113122841.GA13424@fencepost> References: <20041107234609.7bf0abfe@delta.hk.office.outblaze.com> <1099995711.2900.84.camel@stargate> <1100306258.7511.56.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1100306258.7511.56.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop From: Miles Bader Cc: Arch Users , Catalin Marinas , Dustin Sallings , Timothy Webster X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1118 Lines: 32 On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 11:37:38AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > Finally, IIRC the performance data from when I was profiling this, we do > 3* as many stats as required, and correcting that massively improves hot > performance. Yeah, currently tla (like darcs :-) seems extremely unoptimized. It could really benefit from some stupid in-memory caching of such things; maybe an optimization freak (like a typical linux hacker...) sitting down and looking at strace output. > Arch can do single patch merges, I wrote pure-merge.sh ages ago (2 years > I think) which does precisely that, automatically, but doesn't handle > all the cases of conflicts that can occur. Andrew Suffield and I > hammered out the algorithm for handling those, but no ones implemented > it in the intervening time. Is there a text file or something describing this algorithm? Thanks, -Miles -- I'd rather be consing. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/