Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAC29XGk002887 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 02:09:35 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0B677534 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 02:09:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSR13-0006ar-1T for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:18:21 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CSR0M-0006VM-Tc for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:17:38 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CSR0L-0006Uc-Mi for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:17:38 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSR0L-0006US-GK for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:17:37 -0500 Received: from [204.152.189.135] (helo=kechara.flame.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CSQrT-00082J-VM for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:08:28 -0500 Received: (qmail 18640 invoked by uid 323); 12 Nov 2004 02:08:23 -0000 To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Mail-Follow-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal References: <20041025210724.GA19744@merconline.com> <200410272144.i9RLiYnd074868@xl2.seyza.com> <41803AEC.1050209@panoramicfeedback.com> <200410281727.i9SHRS8v084841@xl2.seyza.com> <41814B9E.5040601@panoramicfeedback.com> <200410282006.i9SK6Kk2086420@xl2.seyza.com> <418156C2.3010506@panoramicfeedback.com> <87is8r8lxq.fsf@flame.org> <200411011634.iA1GYMX3030017@xl2.seyza.com> <873bztnze1.fsf@flame.org> <200411011952.iA1JqoRC031047@xl2.seyza.com> <87brehjjug.fsf@jack.ou-data.net> <200411021737.iA2HbuGw034672@xl2.seyza.com> <87hdo0bnab.fsf@jack.ou-data.net> From: Matthew Dempsky In-Reply-To: <87hdo0bnab.fsf@jack.ou-data.net> (Yann Droneaud's message of "Mon, 08 Nov 2004 12:19:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:09:53 -0600 Message-ID: <878y977r7y.fsf@flame.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1063 Lines: 31 Yann Droneaud writes: >> > We switch from bazaar to cathedral model >> >> I'm not sure that that's even a meaningful statement. > > I tried to mean that James was merging patches as they come, without > following a development schedule of what features to add, merge, > improve: it's bazaar style. > > As i read the rel-src-mgt.txt, we need some sort of roadmap for the new > features (bug fix are generally not candidate for that ;) : > this is catheadraal style. I have to agree with Tom -- arguing whether this is bazaar or cathedral's not meaningful. The new process still involves third parties being able to participate in development, a central authority over the mainline tree, and a mechanism for having patches incorporated. Feel free to call that process whatever you will. A rose by any other name... _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/