Message-ID: <41939CEE.2010409@panoramicfeedback.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:10:06 -0500
From: Aaron Bentley <abentley@panoramicfeedback.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
References: <20041107234609.7bf0abfe@delta.hk.office.outblaze.com>
	<slrncp74m0.ftv.jgoerzen@christoph.complete.org>
In-Reply-To: <slrncp74m0.ftv.jgoerzen@christoph.complete.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 937
Lines: 31
John Goerzen wrote:
> Here are the plusses for Darcs over tla in my mind:

> 2. Every checkout gives you a repository.  *Excellent* for offline
> hacking for laptop users.  This is a great way to work.

Hmm.  I wonder if there might be even better ways to support this use 
case in Arch.

Is it the repository that's useful or the fact that you can commit?  It 
certainly seems conceivable to have a commit-style command that would 
transparently create a local version of the upstream branch in your 
archive on the first commit.

If it's the history that's useful, then you'd need a different kind of 
get that auto-mirrored.  Or possibly Arch Cache.

Aaron
-- 
Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/