Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAALQjv6003073 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:26:45 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E40C53B5E for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:26:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CS07o-000609-K7 for migo@homemail.com; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:35:32 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CS06u-0005ps-5L for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:34:36 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CS06t-0005pS-DF for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:34:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CS06t-0005pN-7T for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:34:35 -0500 Received: from [83.216.134.182] (helo=cyclone.suffields.me.uk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CRzxq-0003ne-S2 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:25:15 -0500 Received: from asuffield by cyclone.suffields.me.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CRzxq-0002Oe-00 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:25:14 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:25:14 +0000 From: Andrew Suffield To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: trained dependency Message-ID: <20041110212513.GF5978@suffields.me.uk> Mail-Followup-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <1099863337.28980.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87bre8dh85.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <1099896782.3026.107.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87oei8bnhs.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20041108145641.GA4720@suffields.me.uk> <87fz3k8gyf.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <200411082337.iA8NbLxf084841@xl2.seyza.com> <877jov8ub2.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20041110191419.GA5978@suffields.me.uk> <200411102123.iAALNfo0094277@xl2.seyza.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200411102123.iAALNfo0094277@xl2.seyza.com> X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0000335828==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 2876 Lines: 89 --===============0000335828== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rMWmSaSbD7nr+du9" Content-Disposition: inline --rMWmSaSbD7nr+du9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:23:41PM -0800, Thomas Lord wrote: > > From: Andrew Suffield >=20 > > > They're not underprepared; they're overprepared. In fact, they're > > > cooked to the point where all the juice has evaporated. Japanese > > > students know how to sit at desks, look at books, and memorize hu= ge > > > amounts of material. They have huge amounts of information store= d, > > > but no concept of how to wrap that expressive material around ori= ginal > > > thoughts. >=20 > > This is the normal perception of graduate students by industries > > everywhere. Probably deservedly; most people have no more than a > > handful of original thoughts in their entire lives. >=20 > > I have never seen any education system which performed appreciably > > better at this. As best I can tell, it's normally left to natural > > aptitude. I've never seen any evidence that there is a practical way > > to teach this sort of thing. >=20 >=20 > Where did /you/ come from? Are your gifts and advantages purely > genetic? Or did you luck into a circumstance wich might have some > more "commodifiable" properties? I can think of no meaningful way to determine that. There's no obvious answer and no practical way to sample it either. > Your fetishsizing of "original thoughts" is also problematic. We've > known that interesting original thoughts can be systematically and > reliably cranked out, nearly assembly-line fashion, since Fluxus and > Eno, at least. Infinite monkeys do not count :P Besides, my point stands as stated. Most people *don't*. --=20 .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | --rMWmSaSbD7nr+du9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBkoc5lpK98RSteX8RAgU+AJ951TLakngi/mm16ccxR1nlWXRD9ACfWF3y 7CyKmOLaqDNc/LbBl3iO0d8= =95Hm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rMWmSaSbD7nr+du9-- --===============0000335828== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============0000335828==--