Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25])
	by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA8NkWgQ000961
	for <migo@freeshell.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 23:46:32 GMT
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165])
	by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB583539D7
	for <migo@homemail.com>; Mon,  8 Nov 2004 23:46:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CRJLN-0005K8-Qu
	for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 18:54:41 -0500
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CRJL1-0005K3-HW
	for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 18:54:19 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CRJL1-0005Jr-6F
	for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 18:54:19 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRJL1-0005Jo-2Q
	for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 18:54:19 -0500
Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CRJCb-0007Yf-KW
	for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 18:45:37 -0500
Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca
	[132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 591788282DC; Mon,  8 Nov 2004 18:45:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84])
	by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D855B4AC91F; Mon,  8 Nov 2004 18:45:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848)
	id C63AC8CA69; Mon,  8 Nov 2004 18:45:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <jwvzn1roqib.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user@gnu.org>
To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
References: <vpqwtwx1ebp.fsf@ecrins.imag.fr>
	<20041107225337.GA29137@fencepost> <vpqu0s1z0wu.fsf@ecrins.imag.fr>
	<buois8g29dw.fsf_-_@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<jwvy8hcou92.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user@gnu.org>
	<20041108230640.GB26052@fencepost>
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 18:45:34 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20041108230640.GB26052@fencepost> (Miles Bader's message of
	"Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:06:40 -0500")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0,
	requis 5)
X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Dubious coding practice in xtla
X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish <gnu-arch-users.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users>,
	<mailto:gnu-arch-users-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/gnu-arch-users>
List-Post: <mailto:gnu-arch-users@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gnu-arch-users-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users>,
	<mailto:gnu-arch-users-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 520
Lines: 18
>> I like to use `lexical-let' instead.
> I try not to think about the code that expands into...

That's a very good habit, indeed.  Better yet: try to think about the code
it will expand into once your lexically-scoped-elisp branch is finally
merged into the main Emacs distribution.


        Stefan


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/