Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA8MPXWZ010687 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:25:33 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBB65399E for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:24:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRI4v-0002hT-Mr for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:33:37 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRI3p-0002MR-6l for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:32:29 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRI3o-0002MF-Gi for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:32:28 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRI3o-0002M8-6m for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:32:28 -0500 Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CRHvP-0004bh-2S for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:23:47 -0500 Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300808282FC; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:23:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34A74AC8F1; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:23:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E193F8CA69; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:23:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <20041107225337.GA29137@fencepost> From: Stefan Monnier Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:23:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:32:43 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Dubious coding practice in xtla X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 515 Lines: 21 > conflict; I sometimes prepend the name of the caller for this purpose, > e.g., > (defun my-funny-function () > ... > (let ((my-funny-function-var1 ...)) > (use-my-lambda (lambda () ... my-funny-function-var1 ...)))) I like to use `lexical-let' instead. Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/