Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA84laEC024169 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 04:47:37 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75C3776A6 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 04:47:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CR1Za-0007Nk-J6 for migo@homemail.com; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 23:56:10 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CR1Z3-0007MQ-Rl for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 23:55:37 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CR1Z2-0007LZ-Io for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 23:55:36 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CR1Z2-0007LR-Cw for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 23:55:36 -0500 Received: from [203.86.166.82] (helo=corpmail.outblaze.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CR1Q6-0007h1-Sn for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 23:46:23 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by corpmail.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7421437C28 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 04:46:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.hk1.outblaze.com (smtp1.hk1.outblaze.com [203.86.166.80]) by corpmail.outblaze.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 96CE516DD88 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 04:46:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 22881 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2004 04:46:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delta.hk.office.outblaze.com) (timw@team.outblaze.com@210.17.191.226) by smtp1.hk1.outblaze.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2004 04:46:10 -0000 Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 23:46:09 -0500 From: Timothy Webster To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Message-ID: <20041107234609.7bf0abfe@delta.hk.office.outblaze.com> Organization: Outblaze X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12cvs65.1 (GTK+ 2.4.13; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.2-8; VAE: 6.28.0.12; VDF: 6.28.0.59; host: corpmail.outblaze.com) Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] darcs vs tla X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 690 Lines: 21 After spending some time investigating darcs. I must say, I like the simplicity of its interface and design. However I am concerned about "problems" related to async patch updates is still an ongoing development with lots of discussion. I would like to hear from users who have tried both tla and darcs. And specifically why I should not go with darcs. I am currently leaning towards darcs,with over 300 machines in the balance I want to make the right decision. -Tim _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/