Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA57S66j005371 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:28:11 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B65876F6C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:28:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CPye6-00037q-V1 for migo@homemail.com; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:36:31 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CPyda-00037b-Ey for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:35:58 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CPyda-00037P-22 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:35:58 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CPydZ-00037M-Vk for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:35:58 -0500 Received: from [210.143.35.52] (helo=tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CPyUt-0005IP-Gq; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:27:00 -0500 Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.160] (may be forged)) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id iA57Qjn16932; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:26:46 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id iA57Qj403043; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:26:45 +0900 (JST) Received: from edtmg02.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.16.202]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id iA57Qi905850; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:26:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edtmg02.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA57Qf4m013672; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:26:42 +0900 (JST) Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id iA57Qewt007629; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:26:41 +0900 (JST) Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id CF8DC40E; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:26:40 +0900 (JST) To: tomas@fabula.de References: <1099446280.4925.64.camel@localhost> <20041103040703.3047fbc6@comet> <1099451838.22720.115.camel@localhost> <20041104084631.GA16959@netpioneer.de> <1099583618.8195.5.camel@localhost> <20041105072009.GB7429@www> From: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 16:26:40 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20041105072009.GB7429@www> (tomas@fabula.de's message of "Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:20:09 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, Charles Duffy Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: wiki spam & user registration X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Miles Bader List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 868 Lines: 19 tomas@fabula.de writes: >> (A captcha, btw, is a "Completely Automated Public Test to tell >> Computers and Humans Apart"; [...] > > [getting off-topic, but still funny, so...] > > and you know how they are being circumvented, don't you? I think registration + moderation is the only thing that seems truly workable (a whitelist for people that have been successfully moderated 3 times or more, and a blacklist for people that have been rejected, would keep moderation delays/burden fairly minimal). Needs a wiki hacker though, I guess. -Miles -- "Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." Mahatma Gandhi _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/