Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9CDpxQj016843 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:52:00 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD3F76EE2 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:52:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHNBK-00046d-7Y for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:59:14 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHNAq-00042y-Qd for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:58:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHNAp-000425-Ba for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:58:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHNAp-000422-9Y for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:58:43 -0400 Received: from [209.158.45.74] (helo=linuxguru.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CHN2Y-0004xO-11 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:50:10 -0400 Received: by linuxguru.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id 0E74A3B4029; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:50:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by comet.merconline.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6B4C1127337; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:49:42 -0400 (EDT) To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Having two precommit hooks In-Reply-To: References: <20041007134742.GA6373@www> <41654FC3.1060507@panoramicfeedback.com> <416555E6.9090706@johnmeinel.com> <41656099.6000808@panoramicfeedback.com> <416581CF.6040200@johnmeinel.com> <4165872E.9030203@panoramicfeedback.com> <416610CD.5090203@johnmeinel.com> <416679FF.80707@panoramicfeedback.com> <1097301232.6235.93.camel@localhost> <20041009160345.53440c59.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <20041009163730.GA22154@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <200410092024.i99KO4of036759@xl2.seyza.com> Mail-Folloup-To: never Mail-Copies-To: never Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:49:42 -0400 Message-Id: <20041012134942.6B4C1127337@comet.merconline.com> From: jblack@merconline.com (James Blackwell) X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1197 Lines: 36 Matthieu Moy: > 1) It is easy to forget about the wrapper script, and run "tla commit" > by mistake. This one doesn't count, because the script is called 'tla' > 2) front-ends to xtla won't be aware of the the wrapper script, and > will run "tla commit" anyway. For someone using, say, sometimes > xtla and sometimes fai, this requires a painfull customization. > (currently, xtla has no precommit hook, so, the user will have to > write some elisp to achieve that) DOH! Yeah, this could screw with frontends. > By the way, is there a particular reason why there's a post-commit > hook ? Personally, I use post commit hooks a lot. I use post-commit hooks to automatically archive mirrors, automatically ssh into another machine and "replay"... etc. -- James Blackwell Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give Smile more! each person you meet a compliment! GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/