Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:10:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200411042010.iA4KAmpk055824@xl2.seyza.com>
From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
To: zen@cashpoolcomps.com
bc: lord
In-reply-to: <1099597463.10774.302.camel@localhost.localdomain> (message from
	Zenaan Harkness on Fri, 05 Nov 2004 06:44:24 +1100)
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: trained dependency
References: <20041104003210.33648.qmail@web54408.mail.yahoo.com>
	<1099530051.10774.225.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<87sm7qgr5x.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
	<1099597463.10774.302.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, stephen@xemacs.org
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1068
Lines: 34

    > From: Zenaan Harkness <zen@cashpoolcomps.com>

    > Based on my own experience of school, which I started after a year and
    > two thirds of home schooling (which I started at the age of 7), here are
    > some things I believe:
    >  - school does not teach the way I learn
    >  - school is not conducive to forming original thought
    >  - school is not conducive to self confidence


Those are awefully broad conclusions to draw from such a singular data
point.  Didn't they teach you the scientific method in home-school?

Now if you'd said:

    >  - the school I attended did not teach the way I learn
    >  - the school I attended was not conducive to forming original thought
    >  - the school I attended was not conducive to self confidence
    [...]

then maybe you wouldn't sound like you were going off half-cocked.

-t


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/