Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA1JphoJ012089 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 19:51:43 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE64876FFC for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 19:51:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COiLR-0006s7-KY for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 15:00:01 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1COiL1-0006rt-8W for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:59:35 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1COiL0-0006rZ-FL for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:59:34 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COiL0-0006rO-9N for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:59:34 -0500 Received: from [68.93.27.60] (helo=dazed.slacker.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1COiCy-00051y-5E for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:51:16 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.115] (rrcs-24-227-173-102.sw.biz.rr.com [24.227.173.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dazed.slacker.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBB5BDE16 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:51:15 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: community spirit From: Mike Partin To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1099338820.3424.81.camel@gilligan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 13:53:40 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1757 Lines: 48 Apologies, I meant this to go to the list. > On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 12:06, Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote: > I don't think having n wrappers in people's favorite scripting languages > makes much sense. I would like one binary that I can easily install on > any kind of system, without being root, and without having to install > tons* of library-files as well. > > I also think the use of wrappers will fragment the community, it is > already quite common to have a newbie user ask something like: > Kind of like the choice of window managers or editors? Come on man, this argument smacks of the Microsoft Mentality(tm). It's the abundance of choice that makes the open source community what it is. "I don't like the tool you use, but this one works great for me." It's all about choice. > -- which is useless unless one chooses to install fancywrapper, with > it's 1000+ files of dependencies. > I'm not sure which tool you're even referring to at this point, other than the stuff from canonical and that's only because they use the tla source tree as far as I'm aware. If I'm missing something I would love for you to give me some examples. > *) For instance, on my workstation: > > cd /usr/lib/python2.3 > find -type f | wc -l > > yields 1312 files. > What's your point? 99% of that is likely the standard library, which has nothing to do with tla or wrappers. That's like going into /usr/include and running 'find -type f | wc -l' and saying "Oh gee look at all the stuff tla installs, I don't like that". -Mike "Fuzzy" Partin _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/