Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9C8SQG1029396 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:28:27 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31115396E for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:28:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHI8B-00017Y-K2 for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:35:39 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHI7O-00016g-ED for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:34:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHI7N-00016M-MI for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:34:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHI7N-00016C-JQ for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:34:49 -0400 Received: from [195.27.129.236] (helo=mailsc1.simcon-mt.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CHI0M-0002MO-Gd for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:27:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailsc1.simcon-mt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26C93247F; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:27:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by gate.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922E8EC33; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:27:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by avorop.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C3F6716806E; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:30:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:30:16 +0200 From: "Andrei A. Voropaev" To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] caching revisions Message-ID: <20041012083016.GA15654@avorop.local> Mail-Followup-To: Johannes Berg , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <20041011103527.GA13474@avorop.local> <20041011121918.GA5673@iup.edu> <20041011130534.GC13474@avorop.local> <1097525299.3407.1.camel@johannes> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1097525299.3407.1.camel@johannes> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by (amavisd-new) at local gate Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 824 Lines: 23 On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 10:08:19PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 15:05 +0200, Andrei A. Voropaev wrote: > > Ok. Thank you. As long as revision is cached I don't need anything else. > > Actually, you should uncacherev and re-cacherev as the tar file is most > likely not bitwise identical to the first one. Part of the bug is that > the tar.gz is replaced, but the checksum is not, leading to an invalid > checksum on future checks of the cached revision (in effect not having a > cacherev) In this case I've simply recreated the archive. But I'll remember about uncacherev. Andrei _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/