Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 09:46:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200411011746.iA1Hkoit030219@xl2.seyza.com>
From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
To: fw@deneb.enyo.de
In-reply-to: <878y9l7h4a.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (message from Florian Weimer on
	Mon, 01 Nov 2004 15:56:21 +0100)
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] community spirit
References: <200411010336.iA13af6p023128@xl2.seyza.com>
	<878y9l7h4a.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 947
Lines: 33

    > From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>

    > * Thomas Lord:

    > > They did not make even the slightest attempt to alert me before
    > > announcing a fork.

    > What makes this branch so special and different from other branches?
    > Should we ask permission for running "tla tag" from now on?

Don't be silly.

But if you are going to start producing public releases and
encouraging people to use them, perhaps some demonstrated
consideration for the public project's processes and opportunity to
react would be in order, no?

I'm all for firewalls between public volunteer labor and publicly
released corporate projects, but in this case, I think they took the
firewall concept just a little bit too far.

-t


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/