Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9UCi4Xe017523 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:44:05 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3A053527 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:44:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNsiM-0004Hy-HB for migo@homemail.com; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:52:14 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CNshl-0004Hs-BC for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:51:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CNshk-0004Hg-U3 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:51:37 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNshk-0004Hd-R0 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:51:36 -0400 Received: from [202.72.174.244] (helo=patrick.wattle.id.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CNsZa-0000zF-H9 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 08:43:13 -0400 Received: by patrick.wattle.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7FB3353C1A; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:42:53 +0800 (WST) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:42:53 +0800 From: Cameron Patrick To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] per-user =tagging-method Message-ID: <20041030124253.GD26777@patrick.wattle.id.au> Mail-Followup-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <1099112721.17184.70.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041030121836.GA26418@fencepost> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20041030121836.GA26418@fencepost> Organization: Parenthesis Conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2131345675==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1590 Lines: 60 --===============2131345675== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0" Content-Disposition: inline --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Miles Bader wrote: > (rsync is still very dangerous for two-way syncing, but I suppose you could > make it work if you kept a strict discipline). You could use Unison instead, which does work well for two-way syncing. (I feel like I've been plugging unison quite a lot lately, although not on this list.) OTOH I find that these days I use arch for a lot of things which I would otherwise have used unison for. It seems a bit weird to be rsyncing an arch project tree like that. Why not just commit on one machine and update on the other? Cameron. --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBg4xNl1rlvh2uVnMRAo9OAKCQ4dEJxWkv18Ctc31Ch5dIGVbQiwCgoIVW +o1rNs7tDNsZgve1Ax8XOXE= =JYaq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0-- --===============2131345675== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============2131345675==--