Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9TNmWiI012401 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:48:32 GMT Received: from server4.panoramicfeedback.com (server4.panoramicfeedback.com [66.216.124.41]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C218D539D5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:48:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (server4.panoramicfeedback.com [66.216.124.41]) by server4.panoramicfeedback.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i9TNmNil013082; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:48:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4182D6C7.9040604@panoramicfeedback.com> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:48:23 -0400 From: Aaron Bentley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikhael Goikhman Cc: Zenaan Harkness , arch Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Announce: axp - a new command line tool References: <20041028155630.GA21846@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <1099082358.26442.135.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041029232218.GA22463@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> In-Reply-To: <20041029232218.GA22463@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Panometrics-MailScanner: Found to be clean Status: RO Content-Length: 552 Lines: 17 Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 30 Oct 2004 06:39:19 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >>why not be a full front end? > > > There are just too many reasons for this. In no particular order: > > * I am mostly happy with tla, and very happy with the shell > * I don't really want to step on the Aaron's territory just because > I think I have a better technology; he is a significant arch expert You flatter me; don't worry about my feelings. I won't be crushed if people adopt something else. But what's this superior tech? I'm curious. Aaron