Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9SNhRbc021825 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:43:28 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C600076E5F for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:43:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNK3K-0007NT-NF for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:51:34 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CNK2r-0007JW-WA for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:51:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CNK2r-0007Io-1l for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:51:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNK2q-0007Ic-RB for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:51:04 -0400 Received: from [144.140.71.11] (helo=gizmo01ps.bigpond.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CNJux-0004BS-0Q for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:42:55 -0400 Received: (qmail 19509 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2004 23:42:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam12.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.103) by gizmo01ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 28 Oct 2004 23:42:49 -0000 Received: from cpe-144-132-211-224.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.211.224]) by psmam12.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 234/114749037) with SMTP id 114749037; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:42:49 +1000 Received: by poolcompsonline.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5CE13788A1; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:45:09 +1000 Subject: Re: OT: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Encrypted archives? From: Zenaan Harkness To: Gnu Arch Users In-Reply-To: <20041028105331.GA4446@localhost.localdomain> References: <16768.32886.39554.978978@jin.myrkraverk.com> <1098944521.11312.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041028105331.GA4446@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1099007109.26442.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:45:09 +1000 X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 40 On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 20:53, Robin Green wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 04:22:01PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > the point being, these > > are basically similar (haven't done it for a while, so it's almost > > certainly missing the precise options): > > > > host recver: nc -l port|gpg --decrypt|cpio -imuvd > > host sender: find blah|cpio -o|gpg --encrypt|nc host port > > > > > > vs > > > > host recver: ssh??|cpio -imuvd > > host sender: find blah|cpio -o|ssh ?? > > The difference: > With ssh you don't need to set up a sender and a receiver - you can do > it all with one command line. You still have to have a receiver (it's just for rsync and ssh(client) the receiver is the sshd daemon, but it still has to be there/ installed and running), and from GNU -> Windows, it aint necessarily easy to get sshd installed and running. So the small orthogonal utilities are a real lifesaver in such situations. Were for me anyway... > Also, ssh provides secure authentication and high-quality "checksumming". Agreed everything has its place. cheers zen _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/