Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9S7PoSj002081 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:25:50 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBF953936 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:25:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CN4nA-0000ot-0J for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:33:52 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CN4mo-0000oo-Vx for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:33:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CN4mn-0000oR-Su for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:33:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CN4mn-0000oC-Pz for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:33:29 -0400 Received: from [129.88.30.1] (helo=imag.imag.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CN4eF-00039w-Mx for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:24:40 -0400 Received: from ecrins.imag.fr (ecrins.imag.fr [129.88.43.124]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9S7OWif010089; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:24:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moy by ecrins.imag.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CN4e8-0001wN-00; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:24:32 +0200 To: Aaron Bentley References: <20041025210724.GA19744@merconline.com> <200410272144.i9RLiYnd074868@xl2.seyza.com> <41803AEC.1050209@panoramicfeedback.com> From: Matthieu Moy Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bentley , Thomas Lord , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:24:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <41803AEC.1050209@panoramicfeedback.com> (Aaron Bentley's message of "Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:18:52 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:24:32 +0200 (CEST) X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, Thomas Lord Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1262 Lines: 32 Aaron Bentley writes: > These problems do not necessarily go away if we change to a > one-version-per-merge model. It's quite likely that my submissions > will not be originated in the version that I submit for merging. That partly solves the problem for the development of tla, but I think other projects need something about patch log pruning, and I don't think that's a good idea to force all projects to use the same model. > Let's end with a threat: if you go ahead with =merged, I will do my > level best to support it in Fai. For cases where the merged version > has patchlogs in the tree, I can implement a "replay --skip-present" > workalike that will use the changeset contents to determine whether a > patch should be applied. That will make Fai a significantly less > broken tool for developing tla than tla itself. You don't really want > that, do you? :-) I also don't want that because this would mean either to re-implement that in Xtla, or use Fai as a back-end for Xtla. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/