Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9S0tiBJ026109 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:55:45 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6668D770A5 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:55:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMyhf-0007SH-Dv for migo@homemail.com; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:03:47 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMygs-0007RF-Sv for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:02:59 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMygr-0007Qq-UP for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:02:58 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMygr-0007QS-OB for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:02:57 -0400 Received: from [66.216.124.41] (helo=server4.panoramicfeedback.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CMyYs-0003T6-G1 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:54:42 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.7] (server4.panoramicfeedback.com [66.216.124.41]) by server4.panoramicfeedback.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i9S0sdil013553; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:54:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4180434E.9040405@panoramicfeedback.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:54:38 -0400 From: Aaron Bentley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Lord Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal References: <20041025210724.GA19744@merconline.com> <200410272144.i9RLiYnd074868@xl2.seyza.com> <41803AEC.1050209@panoramicfeedback.com> In-Reply-To: <41803AEC.1050209@panoramicfeedback.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Panometrics-MailScanner: Found to be clean Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 506 Lines: 19 Aaron Bentley wrote: > in the plan. But it's quite reasonable that my tlasrc--devel--0.2 tree > would have no patchlogs for tlasrc--devel--0.2. Of course, this should read: But it's quite reasonable that my tlasrc--devel--0.2 tree would have no patchlogs for tlasrc--submit--2.2 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/