Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200410272211.i9RMB5FE074954@xl2.seyza.com>
From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
To: stephen@xemacs.org
In-reply-to: <877jpew2hl.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org)
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment
References: <87vfd5xhe0.fsf@flame.org> <20041020214600.GA624@merconline.com>
	<1098313404.5336.26.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com>
	<87brewc8fr.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<200410252004.i9PK4Pw8066415@xl2.seyza.com>
	<20041026000504.C2FA6B7E50@comet.merconline.com>
	<877jpew2hl.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 903
Lines: 28

    > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>

    > Many projects have made this transition.  I don't see why Tom won't do
    > what such maintainers normally do:

    > 1. He asks for assignments.  If he doesn't get them,
    > 2. He asks for volunteers to reimplement.  If he doesn't get them,
    > 3. He asks himself to reimplement.  If he refuses,
    > 4. He pulls the code out.

Again, my understanding is that, given the quanities involved here,
replacing unassigned code with assigned is certainly a winning thing
to happen, when it does, but won't be a priority.  There isn't a rush
to pull out unassigned code, at all.  I won't do the assignment
otherwise.

-t


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/