Message-ID: <417FDAB8.6060506@panoramicfeedback.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:28:24 -0400
From: Aaron Bentley <abentley@panoramicfeedback.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Wilcox <andrew-618963079@andrew.wilcox.name>
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Newbie confusion "illegal revision name"
References: <E1CMrHA-0000jn-00@jasper.andrew.wilcox.name>
In-Reply-To: <E1CMrHA-0000jn-00@jasper.andrew.wilcox.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 911
Lines: 31
Andrew Wilcox wrote:
>     $ tla changes patch-3
>     changes: illegal revision name: patch-3
> 
> I say, "huh?  What's wrong with the revision name?  Does tla not
> understand that I have that revision in my project?" and I'd go on
> and try something else.

"patch-3" is a patchlevel, not a revision name of any kind.
"foo--bar--0--patch-3" is a revision name, and it would be acceptable here.
"me@example.com/foo--bar--0--patch-3" is a fully-qualified revision 
name, and it would also be acceptable.

So your proposed changes would be incorrect.  Anyhow, there's a better 
option: we can make "tla changes patch-3" work.

Aaron

-- 
Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/