Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9PKg8mX024965 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:42:08 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB75353A29 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:42:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBn1-0000w9-MB for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:50:03 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBme-0000vy-1U for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:49:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBmc-0000vH-Mo for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:49:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBmc-0000v7-Hp for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:49:38 -0400 Received: from [205.149.2.136] (helo=xl2.seyza.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CMBee-0001nN-IM for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:41:25 -0400 Received: from xl2.seyza.com (localhost.seyza.com [127.0.0.1]) by xl2.seyza.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9PKhXIb066529; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:43:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lord@xl2.seyza.com) Received: (from lord@localhost) by xl2.seyza.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i9PKhWQA066526; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:43:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lord) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410252043.i9PKhWQA066526@xl2.seyza.com> From: Thomas Lord To: tla@johnmeinel.com In-reply-to: <41787E34.5070209@johnmeinel.com> (message from John Meinel on Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:27:48 -0500) Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File naming conventions References: <1098141434.19575.42.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041018233511.GA31642@fencepost> <1098156854.19575.65.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <1098163496.19575.134.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041019060152.GC18852@wisq.net> <1098311382.11967.35.camel@nemesis.xlii.org> <1098313564.5336.29.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <1098319598.5336.46.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041021123218.GA30989@fencepost> <1098398014.5336.118.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <41786721.4020607@panoramicfeedback.com> <1098413971.5336.140.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <41787E34.5070209@johnmeinel.com> Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 821 Lines: 29 > From: John Meinel > I believe that tla-1.2.2rc2 was just waiting for final approval from Tom > to be released as tla-1.2.2. You are incorrect. The last tla-1.2.2 release candidate had a bug that "the list" of major contributors all agreed implied that "the clock had been reset". In other words: the last 1.2.2 rc was rejected: it had known and unacceptable bugs. The plan would (without process disruption) have been to spend another 30 days on 1.2.2 but (with process disruption) we will instead have a 1.3 test candidate release, hopefully next week. -t _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/