Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9PKe5mX023599 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:40:05 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB28538F4 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:40:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBkx-0000I0-Q8 for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:47:55 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBkV-0000Hb-Un for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:47:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBkU-0000HE-T2 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:47:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMBkU-0000H0-NC for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:47:26 -0400 Received: from [205.149.2.136] (helo=xl2.seyza.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CMBcg-0001Ku-5v for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:39:23 -0400 Received: from xl2.seyza.com (localhost.seyza.com [127.0.0.1]) by xl2.seyza.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9PKfRIb066523; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:41:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lord@xl2.seyza.com) Received: (from lord@localhost) by xl2.seyza.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i9PKfRVF066520; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:41:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lord) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410252041.i9PKfRVF066520@xl2.seyza.com> From: Thomas Lord To: abentley@panoramicfeedback.com In-reply-to: <41787D3E.4030607@panoramicfeedback.com> (message from Aaron Bentley on Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:23:42 -0400) Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File naming conventions References: <1098141434.19575.42.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041018233511.GA31642@fencepost> <1098156854.19575.65.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <1098163496.19575.134.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041019060152.GC18852@wisq.net> <1098311382.11967.35.camel@nemesis.xlii.org> <1098313564.5336.29.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <1098319598.5336.46.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041021123218.GA30989@fencepost> <1098398014.5336.118.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <41786721.4020607@panoramicfeedback.com> <1098413971.5336.140.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <41787D3E.4030607@panoramicfeedback.com> Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, zen@cashpoolcomps.com X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 832 Lines: 26 > From: Aaron Bentley > No, the issue is that without Tom's blessing, doing that would > constitute forking tla. Matthew Dempsky does have Tom's blessing (and > financial backing, AIUI) but Tom's asked him to proceed using the draft > merge policies instead of getting 1.2.2 out the door. Right. I have. My base level of trust in the integration work that went into 1.2.2 crashed through the floor. It's better to lose a few weeks of 1.2.2 work than to have to live in perpetuity with any unforseen consequences of rushing to endorse that work. -t _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/