Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200410252034.i9PKYK4b066494@xl2.seyza.com>
From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
To: miles@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <buo7jpjk21o.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (message from Miles
	Bader on Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:51:47 +0900)
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File naming conventions
References: <1098141434.19575.42.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com>
	<20041018233511.GA31642@fencepost>
	<1098156854.19575.65.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com>
	<buok6tn1foz.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<1098163496.19575.134.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com>
	<20041019060152.GC18852@wisq.net>
	<1098311382.11967.35.camel@nemesis.xlii.org>
	<1098313564.5336.29.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com>
	<vpqmzyhhrhi.fsf@ecrins.imag.fr>
	<1098319598.5336.46.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com>
	<20041021123218.GA30989@fencepost>
	<1098398014.5336.118.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com>
	<BF588F2C-23C1-11D9-86E4-000393CFE6B8@spy.net>
	<buo7jpjk21o.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, zen@cashpoolcomps.com, dustin@spy.net
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1377
Lines: 37

    > From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>

    > Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net> writes:
    > > 	Does anyone have a list of the contributed code that hasn't been 
    > > included?  There have been a few implemented features that I've either 
    > > seen or heard of that I've needed, but aren't in any release.  I'm 
    > > under the impression that new feature work has a pretty high chance of 
    > > ending up wasted effort.

    > It seems like a huge mess to me...  E.g. what's the status of all the
    > stuff merged into the "prerelease" by James -- and the corresponding
    > bugs closed?  Does all that have to be re-submitted now?  Where?  How?
    > When?  [What?]


Yeah, 1.2.2 crashed and burned.  Get over it.   Certain persons may have
given the mistaken impression that they had a lot more to say about
design decisions than they do and more than they should --- but we're
mostly past that, now.

We're looking at a test candidate release next week with a humble but
insistent set of changes.  Less than whatever was dogpiled onto 1.2.2 
but a solid first step towards 1.3.   (No pressure, Matthew :-)

"Long, hard, slog...."
-t


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/