Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9LMLmlM021370 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:21:49 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B76253BD1 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:21:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKlQQ-0004Xm-5x for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:28:50 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKlQ7-0004Xh-OJ for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:28:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKlQ7-0004XV-A3 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:28:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKlQ7-0004XH-6I for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:28:31 -0400 Received: from [144.140.71.21] (helo=gizmo11ps.bigpond.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CKlIL-00021O-0q for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:20:29 -0400 Received: (qmail 15763 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2004 22:20:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam11.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.100) by gizmo11ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2004 22:20:26 -0000 Received: from cpe-144-132-220-21.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.220.21]) by psmam11.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 225/119134555) with SMTP id 119134555; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:20:26 +1000 Received: by freedbms.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 990C03C079; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:21:00 +1000 Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment From: Zenaan Harkness To: arch In-Reply-To: <871xfs4795.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87vfd5xhe0.fsf@flame.org> <20041020214600.GA624@merconline.com> <1098313404.5336.26.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041021010420.GA1945@iup.edu> <1098324514.5336.74.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041021022908.GA2057@iup.edu> <871xfs4795.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098397258.5336.104.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:20:58 +1000 X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1382 Lines: 38 > More important than the fact that the forms are hidden---you don't > have to sign them if you don't like them, and they are negotiable if > the FSF wants your code bad enough, after all---is the fact that > authors' names are may be hidden. This is confusing, due to lack of grammar, and infuriatingly so, since it sounds important and I want to understand it. Please rewrite it when you get time so that I may understand what you're saying here. > In the case of the FSF, as far as I > know anything like that is inadvertant---they keep and publish good > changelogs---but it's theoretically possible. This means that if you > want access to some code under some terms and the FSF won't give it to > you, you are unable to ask the authors to give it to you under the > "grant-back" clause. This sounds like you're saying "sometimes the FSF FiretrUCKs up, and loses correct attribution of code. > That probably doesn't bother anybody else here, but with respect to my > own contributions I dislike it. In which case, use tla and make sure you have a good clean record of your contributions in such case... like, isn't that obvious ??? Please clarify Zen _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/