Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200410211654.i9LGsKXO042514@xl2.seyza.com>
From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
To: jblack@merconline.com
In-reply-to: <20041021040031.CFF3485D7A@comet.merconline.com>
	(jblack@merconline.com)
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment
References: <87vfd5xhe0.fsf@flame.org> <20041020214600.GA624@merconline.com>
	<1098313404.5336.26.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com>
	<20041021040031.CFF3485D7A@comet.merconline.com>
Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1104
Lines: 33


    > From: jblack@merconline.com (James Blackwell)

    > Regarding Tom's "assign copyright to the FSF idea", I don't have an
    > opinion that I would like to express at this point. Before I do, I'd
    > like to know how he'll work out the details of the following two points: 

    > 1. How does he plan on chasing down the previous contributors and
    >    getting a copyright assignment? 

    > 2. Is he going to follow through and remove code contributed by people
    >    that he either can't find or that refuse to assign copyright to him
    >    or the FSF 

    > These are both necessary steps of the process, 

You are mistaken although it is not important, right now, to spend too
much time trying to clarify the exact details.

And the copyright assignment task is progressing slowly, right now,
but should make more progress within the next couple of months.

-t


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/