Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9L4fJ1q024027 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 04:41:20 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB2B53C37 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 04:41:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKUsi-00017L-HE for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:48:56 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKUsP-00017D-4d for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:48:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKUsO-00016v-Ec for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:48:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKUsO-00016l-BY for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:48:36 -0400 Received: from [144.140.70.40] (helo=gizmo05bw.bigpond.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CKUkY-00046U-Cp for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:40:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 12993 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2004 04:40:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bwmam11.bigpond.com) (144.135.24.100) by gizmo05bw.bigpond.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2004 04:40:28 -0000 Received: from cpe-144-132-220-21.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.220.21]) by bwmam11.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 180/151121410) with SMTP id 151121410; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:40:28 +1000 Received: by freedbms.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3AB63C079; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:41:01 +1000 Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU copyright assignment From: Zenaan Harkness To: arch In-Reply-To: <20041021040031.CFF3485D7A@comet.merconline.com> References: <87vfd5xhe0.fsf@flame.org> <20041020214600.GA624@merconline.com> <1098313404.5336.26.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041021040031.CFF3485D7A@comet.merconline.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098333659.5336.85.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:40:59 +1000 X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 3524 Lines: 95 On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 14:00, James Blackwell wrote: > jblack: > >> Speaking of which, how far along is the process of getting everybody with > >> copyright in arch to assign copyright to the FSF? Also, what's going to > >> happen to code that isn't handed over? > > Zenaan: > > Rather than "letting life do it to me", how about getting > > clear on what _you_ want, making suggestions, and discussing > > on the list? > > Grin. What I want is for arch development to move as fast as possible, > so fast that it beats all the others by default. :) > Regarding Tom's "assign copyright to the FSF idea", I don't have an > opinion that I would like to express at this point. Before I do, I'd > like to know how he'll work out the details of the following two points: > > 1. How does he plan on chasing down the previous contributors and > getting a copyright assignment? > > 2. Is he going to follow through and remove code contributed by people > that he either can't find or that refuse to assign copyright to him > or the FSF > > These are both necessary steps of the process, and have to happen. As > such, the question need to be asked. > > These are both _very_ important questions, as can be proved by the > ongoing SCO vs. The World copyright case with the Linux kernel. That's > why Linus is investing in a new "follow the bouncing ball" for code > ownership. I personally don't want to get hauled into court 24 months > from now because some guy named Barry McLoy tries to make a 70 yard punt > as a last ditch effort to save his business. Agreed. > > Tom wants this to be a GNU project. > > It already is. I think that was an excellent decision. > > > This has consequences - the primary one being that copyright > > is assigned to the FSF (for "GNU arch proper"). > > That used to be obligatory, but these days its optional. Ahah. Some new information for me. Thanks. > > What sort of community do you want? Who do you plan to be in > > this community? Or will it forever depend on what others say, > > what others do and what others decide? > > I'd like to take those in reverse order if you don't mind. > > When it comes to which voluntary communities that people choose to > participate in, the goals and the action of the community do count; > after all, who would remain in a voluntary community that one thinks is > doing the wrong thing? Of course, I agree. I was hoping my point was rhetorical/ self explanatory. > Regarding deciding who's in this community, I don't think that anybody > has the authority to decide that. And if there was somebody, I certainly > wouldn't want it to be me! I would say, each person decides for himself. I din't think we disagree here... however the question was not "who's in this community" but the rhetorical "who do you plan to be (in this community)" - which hinted at my belief that you were being other than constructive in the conversation. This belief may have been misplaced. > Lastly, for what sort of community would I want? Well, this may sound > silly, but I think I'd really go for some sort of victorian style of > utopia. Sounds possibly interesting, but you'll have to elaborate since I'm not sure what that is, being a 30 year old computer programmer, and not much of a movie buff :) cheers zen _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/