Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9L0leBO002008 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:47:40 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F41276E95 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:47:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKREg-0000hJ-JT for migo@homemail.com; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:55:22 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKRDb-0000Uj-1d for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:54:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKRDV-0000RM-7I for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:54:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKRDU-0000QP-Sb for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:54:08 -0400 Received: from [144.140.71.12] (helo=gizmo02ps.bigpond.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CKR5m-0006Cw-FF for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:46:11 -0400 Received: (qmail 13640 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2004 00:46:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam11.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.100) by gizmo02ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2004 00:46:07 -0000 Received: from cpe-144-132-220-21.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.220.21]) by psmam11.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 225/118151531) with SMTP id 118151531; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:46:07 +1000 Received: by freedbms.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 527253C079; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:46:40 +1000 Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File naming conventions From: Zenaan Harkness To: GNU Arch Users In-Reply-To: References: <1098074588.29545.40.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <1098092294.5219.8.camel@johannes> <20041018181822.GD9196@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <8D7869BC-213A-11D9-A63A-000393CFE6B8@spy.net> <1098141434.19575.42.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041018233511.GA31642@fencepost> <1098156854.19575.65.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <1098163496.19575.134.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041019060152.GC18852@wisq.net> <1098311382.11967.35.camel@nemesis.xlii.org> <1098313564.5336.29.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098319598.5336.46.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:46:38 +1000 X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1716 Lines: 55 On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:58, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Zenaan Harkness writes: > > > Which is therefore a bug in tla inventory: missing -0 option. > > This has already been discussed on this list. Tom didn't agree for > some reasons I couldn't explain. There is a likelihood that he didn't have time to implement an alternative, and also lacked the motivation in that doing so would instantaneously render pika escaping a second class citizen for "your average Unixy guy", which would undermine the grand (and presumably very useful and even more Unixy-in-the-long-term) plan for pika escaping usage and syntax. At the end of the day, I suspect code talks well enough that a pika-escape-removing, null-termination-adding _option_ (say, perhaps, "-0" comes to mind :) would be acceptable. > Another option would be to rewrite xargs. Tom suggested an "xxargs" > that would be pika-escaping aware. I'd like to have this called "tla > xargs" : > > tla inventory --junk | tla xargs rm > > That would work with whatever characters in filenames. Actually, I like that. In fact, I was proposing this type of "tla command" convention earlier on, eg: tla rm tla rmdir tla cp tla mv tla grep tla xargs tla ln There is a strong argument that if tla is behaving differently to traditional Unix tools, that it should provide such sub commands (well, the argument is strong in my mind at least :) I think it comes down to man hours ... for me, perhaps next year. cheers zen _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/