Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9K3RJJO024267 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:27:19 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AD0538AE for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:27:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CK7FV-0007dr-1x for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:34:53 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CK7FA-0007dm-1C for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:34:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CK7F9-0007da-L4 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:34:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CK7F9-0007dX-Dv for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:34:31 -0400 Received: from [202.32.8.214] (helo=tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CK77Q-0006FZ-AS; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:26:32 -0400 Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.161] (may be forged)) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id i9K3QUA00947; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:26:30 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id i9K3QTN13184; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:26:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from edtmg01.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.16.201]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id i9K3QSN20819; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:26:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edtmg01.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9K3QRFE004280; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:26:27 +0900 (JST) Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id i9K3QQwt002544; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:26:26 +0900 (JST) Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 86C4B3C0; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:26:26 +0900 (JST) To: Zenaan Harkness References: <1098241117.11175.42.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> From: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:26:26 +0900 In-Reply-To: <1098241117.11175.42.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> (Zenaan Harkness's message of "Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:58:37 +1000") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: arch Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla revert file... X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Miles Bader List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 749 Lines: 13 Zenaan Harkness writes: > tla file-diffs hello.c | patch -R > > to "revert" a single file. If it is not possible for "tla undo file..." > to reliably not clash with potential project files, perhaps "tla revert" > would be a suitable alternative for undoing changes to a file. How is this different than "tla undo -- FILE..." (I don't know if this is Tom's tla; it's in jblack's tla-1.3 branch though, and works fine)? -Miles -- Suburbia: where they tear out the trees and then name streets after them. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/