Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9JDX3oM017298 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:33:04 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496C35398C for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:33:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJuE4-0006d9-Pw for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:40:32 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJuDU-0006bp-NR for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:39:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJuDT-0006au-Lj for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:39:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJuDT-0006ab-Jd for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:39:55 -0400 Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CJu5J-00060z-L7 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:31:29 -0400 Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670148282AF; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:31:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083EB4AC761; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:31:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E873E8CA23; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:31:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <1098164289.19575.141.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041019055017.GB22979@zipworld.com.au> <1098166702.19575.151.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <1098166968.32057.48.camel@localhost> From: Stefan Monnier Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:31:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1098166968.32057.48.camel@localhost> (Charles Duffy's message of "Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:22:48 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Aborting tla commit X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 654 Lines: 19 > If the symlinks match the regex for category other than source or > unrecognized (such as precious, junk or backup), or they're source and > tagged as such, they won't cause an abort. Otherwise, they will. Actually, last time I checked, they still cause an abort if they're dangling (even if they're marked as `backup', `precious', or `junk'). I think it's a bug (I'm still unsure about `source' danling symlinks). Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/