Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9J5Ovh5014762 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:24:58 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA3D77069 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:24:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJmbn-00073W-Dj for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:32:31 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJmbQ-00072J-QE for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:32:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJmbQ-00071m-BI for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:32:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJmbQ-00071e-7P for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:32:08 -0400 Received: from [144.140.71.11] (helo=gizmo01ps.bigpond.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CJmU2-0004qb-3K for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:24:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 963 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2004 05:24:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam11.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.100) by gizmo01ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 19 Oct 2004 05:24:28 -0000 Received: from cpe-144-132-220-21.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.220.21]) by psmam11.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 225/116000219) with SMTP id 116000219; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:24:28 +1000 Received: by freedbms.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26A503C078; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:24:58 +1000 Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File naming conventions From: Zenaan Harkness To: arch In-Reply-To: References: <1098074588.29545.40.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <1098092294.5219.8.camel@johannes> <20041018181822.GD9196@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> <8D7869BC-213A-11D9-A63A-000393CFE6B8@spy.net> <1098141434.19575.42.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> <20041018233511.GA31642@fencepost> <1098156854.19575.65.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098163496.19575.134.camel@whiskas.cashpoolcomps.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:24:56 +1000 X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 648 Lines: 24 > Is it because of pristines? If so, the solution "a" solution > is to get rid of them, not rename {arch} which is "another" solution We are debating the technical merits of the alternative solutions. I don't exclude "migration of existing archives/ revlibs/ backups" from that discussion, which is perhaps what you're alluding to... If so, I would agree that such migration does not weigh insignificantly in this debate. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/