Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j194E32a001997 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 04:14:03 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2595C5370D for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 04:15:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyjSl-0002Xi-6q for migo@homemail.com; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:28:27 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyjS6-0002T1-BU for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:27:46 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyjRs-0002LF-29 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:27:34 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyjRq-0002JB-Oq for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:27:31 -0500 Received: from [64.233.184.196] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyjB2-0000wG-46 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:10:08 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so92581wri for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:10:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=FlwGmIVyIytGPbxLuBoVqgvZLZZJnfNFiCsF64z/kzqmTTg+H6NVH5groqsIBjvjIdY8UX7RyFTaQV28+flRyZoN/1WRFdaKYcVJWjcA9a/lFAi8zYJeUlMI9qZMpuqqh/OGsn8j8SpdDGSgLcL+Arx2IBNWVoj6PDUycKOpsEg= Received: by 10.54.19.28 with SMTP id 28mr285506wrs; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:10:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.19.70 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:10:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:10:07 +0900 From: Miles Bader To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Cross about cross-posting In-Reply-To: <20050209031725.GA22768@suffields.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <42091D23.9080606@panoramicfeedback.com> <20050209031725.GA22768@suffields.me.uk> X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 618 Lines: 21 On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 03:17:25 +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > So discard duplicates in your mail program. > > That's a stunningly useless suggestion. Then you get half the thread > on -u and half of it on -d, making it impossible to follow. Depends on how you classify mail (yes I know, you're stunningly opinionated about that too). -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/