Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j18Ha6nK006773 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:36:07 GMT Received: from hera.museatech.net (unknown [207.166.200.220]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CCD376F49 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:37:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 31089 invoked by uid 110); 8 Feb 2005 17:36:44 -0000 Received: from gnu-arch-dev-bounces@lists.seyza.com by hera by uid 102 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.106429 secs); 08 Feb 2005 17:36:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hera.museatech.net) (127.0.0.1) by hera.museatech.net with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 17:36:43 -0000 Delivered-To: list-gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com Received: (qmail 31044 invoked by uid 110); 8 Feb 2005 17:36:40 -0000 Received: from migo@sdf.lonestar.org by hera by uid 102 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(207.166.200.201):. Processed in 0.026591 secs); 08 Feb 2005 17:36:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO a1.mx.alal.us) (207.166.200.201) by hera.museatech.net with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 17:36:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 19216 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2005 18:49:24 -0000 Received: from mx.freeshell.org (HELO sdf.lonestar.org) (192.94.73.21) by a1.mx.alal.us with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 18:49:21 -0000 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:migo@ukato.freeshell.org [192.94.73.7]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j18HZVpB006543; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:35:31 GMT Received: (from migo@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.8/Submit) id j18HZVi1029492; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:35:31 GMT Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:35:31 +0000 From: Mikhael Goikhman To: Miles Bader Subject: Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: GNU Arch status update Message-ID: <20050208173531.GB22738@ukato> Mail-Followup-To: Miles Bader , Anand Kumria , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com References: <200502062235.j16MZAG0017878@xl2.seyza.com> <20050207152606.GC15171@ukato> <20050207171312.GA28689@ukato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on dev.alal.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=9.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, Anand Kumria , gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a mailing list for GNU Arch developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-dev-bounces@lists.seyza.com Errors-To: gnu-arch-dev-bounces@lists.seyza.com Status: RO Content-Length: 1192 Lines: 34 On 08 Feb 2005 17:03:39 +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > > So: > > add > rm (alias: remove?) > mv (alias: move, rename) > > add-id > remove-id > move-id The list I posted in "[BUG] Rethinking .." message is similar, but has a serious advantage, it matches the names cvs and svn uses. This is good, it is not like these cvs-like names conflict with any arch concepts. Moreover, "delete-id" is a better term than "remove-id", because arch already uses this name, and produces 'D' in "changes" output. In fact, "R" is used in baz to mean "rename", not "remove"... And "M" means file modification and not "move", but there is nothing to do about this one. As for having "add-id", I see no reason to do this, there is no any confusion about what "add" does. But if "add-id" makes anyone (you) happy, such alias may be added to the list I posted. Personally I believe in aliases, so it is not very important here whether the main spelling is "delete" and "move", or "rm" and "mv". Regards, Mikhael. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-dev mailing list Gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com http://lists.seyza.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-dev