Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j181OVL2017074 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 01:24:32 GMT Received: from emf.net (emf.emf.net [205.149.0.20]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E8F76E9E for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 01:25:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: (from lord@localhost) by emf.net (K/K) id RAA23011; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:25:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:25:25 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Lord Message-Id: <200502080125.RAA23011@emf.net> To: migo@homemail.com Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org, gnu-arch-dev@lists.seyza.com In-reply-to: <20050208004551.GA29063@ukato> (message from Mikhael Goikhman on Tue, 8 Feb 2005 00:45:51 +0000) Subject: Re: [GNU-arch-dev] [BUG] Rethinking add, delete and move commands Status: RO Content-Length: 374 Lines: 12 A funny data point about these commands might be this: I use `add' a lot. But otherwise (and sometimes instead of `add') I find it convenient to perform explicit tagging operations by hand, using nothing more than a good directory editor. I don't know what that implies unless it's that discussion about these commands might be making a mountain out of a molehill. -t