Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j17NXp53022151 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:33:52 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E6D76F66 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:34:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyIbw-000498-M0 for migo@homemail.com; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:48:08 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyITN-0008O0-5U for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:39:17 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyITB-0008IN-IY for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:39:07 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyIT8-0008BY-TP for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:39:03 -0500 Received: from [64.233.184.198] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyIBc-0006PR-VI for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:20:57 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1689wri for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:20:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=nE5rdfxMtjwXOQTv8CfhI+P0Q4raFp8TbEslhv00koCohyo7ShgDIRqr9IIf0GuhV3g0dfopz3CNhl4PlCGvfsDII2nVllEw66pEtGfKpYSYp2Gbh+nd2Iu/P9n8aJsWPXyzfUFp+gXi0nToF4RJWONDG+qcxxdzLv074lOKS6Y= Received: by 10.54.20.13 with SMTP id 13mr8086wrt; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:20:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.19.70 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:20:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:20:56 +0900 From: Miles Bader To: mlh@zipworld.com.au, Miles Bader , gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Mark Mitchell] Moving to an alternate VCS In-Reply-To: <20050207144126.GB15171@ukato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050207125927.GA24662@zipworld.com.au> <20050207144126.GB15171@ukato> Cc: X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 999 Lines: 28 On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:41:26 +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > To Miles: is not having arch taglines in files managed by another RCS > requires some strong discipline and awareness among the developers (i.e. > they should know to assign a new one when copying files). No, not really; taglines are just another piece of information. I've had very nice success with them in Emacs, and by _far_ most annoying problem is when developers try to do something with taglines. If they just ignore then entirely, things work very well. > Is not it much > better and more transparent for both sides to use SVN <-> ARCH converter, > rather then having two incompatible ways of tracking file renames? They are not incompatible... -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/